The Antibacterial Activity of Honey

The antibacterial action of honey arises from the synergistic effects of multiple components, encompassing not only its physical hyperosmotic environment but also active substances generated through enzymatic reactions and secondary metabolites derived from nectar source plants. In recent years, amid the growing crisis of antibiotic resistance, honey has regained significant attention as a potential natural antibacterial agent (NIKHAT S et al., 2022).

High Osmotic Pressure: Creating a Microenvironment Unfavorable for Bacterial Survival

The high concentration of carbohydrates is a key factor in honey's antibacterial activity. Research by Juraj M et al. (2021) indicates that the high osmotic pressure created by a high-sugar environment leads to reduced water activity, causing microbial cell dehydration and thereby inhibiting their growth and reproduction. Simply put, the high sugar concentration in honey creates an environment where bacteria "dehydrate and die."

However, the antibacterial effect is not absolute. Wang Yin et al. (2022) note that some osmotolerant yeasts can survive the high osmotic pressure of honey, causing fermentation, which is one reason why improper storage can lead to honey spoilage. Lokman et al. (2022) emphasize that the antibacterial activity of honey is closely related to its carbohydrate concentration, a property that provides an important scientific basis for its application in antimicrobial fields.

NOLAN VC et al. (2019) systematically described the physicochemical properties of honey: high sugar content, low pH, and high viscosity collectively create a microenvironment characterized by high osmotic pressure, relatively high acidity, and low water activity–conditions unsuitable for bacterial survival. PRAETINEE et al. (2015) further pointed out that due to the high concentration and low moisture content of raw honey, its hygroscopicity and hyperosmotic properties are enhanced. It inhibits microbial growth by expelling water from microbial cells, ultimately causing them to die from desiccation.

Acidic Environment: Favorable Conditions for Tissue Repair

Under the action of glucose oxidase, glucose is broken down into gluconic acid, significantly lowering the pH of honey. This acidic environment plays multiple roles in the wound healing process.

Research by MANISHA et al. (2011) showed that an acidic honey environment reduces the activity of proteases and esterases, increases oxygen saturation, and eliminates certain microorganisms that impede the healing process. ARAYA et al. (2016) found that a lower pH improves target cell infiltration, promoting the aggregation of fibroblasts and macrophages, thereby accelerating tissue regeneration.

MORRONI et al. (2018) noted that a low pH environment favors the biological activity of glucose oxidase and catalase, creating conditions for the subsequent production of hydrogen peroxide.

Hydrogen Peroxide System: An Activatable Antibacterial "Weapon"

Glucose in honey, under the action of glucose oxidase, produces hydrogen peroxide. Research by MOLAN P et al. (2009) revealed a key phenomenon: hydrogen peroxide cannot be detected in raw honey, but upon dilution, glucose oxidase becomes activated, converting glucose into gluconic acid and releasing hydrogen peroxide. This means honey's antibacterial system has a "demand-activated" feature–antibacterial substances are released only when honey comes into contact with exudate from a wound.

KWAKMAN et al. (2010) confirmed that the generated hydrogen peroxide causes oxidative damage to bacterial cells, thereby disrupting nucleic acid integrity and inhibiting microbial growth. Furthermore, studies by MOLAN et al. (2009) and ZHU et al. (2017) indicate that hydrogen peroxide can also disinfect wounds, stimulate the production of vascular endothelial growth factor, improve angiogenesis, and positively impact healing.

JONATHAN et al. (2009) pointed out that the inherent chemical components of honey include not only hydrogen peroxide but also antimicrobial peptides and plant polyphenols, which work together to inhibit the growth of nutrient microbial cells and spores.

Plant-Derived Compounds: Unique Antibacterial Power Conferred by Nectar Source

Phenolic compounds and organic acids in honey can effectively inhibit the growth and reproduction of microorganisms. Research by DOUGLAS et al. (2002) and MANUEL et al. (2008) confirmed that the activity of these components is primarily influenced by the chemical composition of the source plant, with honey from different floral origins exhibiting varying antibacterial properties.

MARIA et al. (2011), using chloroform:ethyl acetate (4.4:0.6) as the mobile phase, extracted polyphenolic substances from Argentine honey samples and confirmed their high antibacterial efficacy. This provides direct evidence for a non-hydrogen peroxide-dependent antibacterial mechanism in honey.

Lysozyme: An Additional Advantage of Fresh Honey

Research by PRAETINEE et al. (2015) found that honey also contains lysozyme–an effective natural antibacterial agent. Notably, the concentration of lysozyme is higher in freshly extracted honey compared to aged honey. This scientifically supports the traditional wisdom of consuming fresh honey.

Clinical Applications: New Hope Against Drug-Resistant Bacteria

Honey's antibacterial properties have led to its widespread application in wound healing and the treatment of various other diseases, both in vivo and in vitro.

Combating drug-resistant bacteria: Clinical research by NIKHAT S et al. (2022) showed that in cases where antibiotics are ineffective, honey can clear infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Neisseria meningitidis, Pseudomonas, Enterococcus, and other bacteria in wounds.

Broad-spectrum antibacterial effect: Cremers et al. (2020), studying two different formulations of commercially available medical-grade honey, found that it inhibited 11 Staphylococcus and 11 Pseudomonas isolates, confirming honey's effectiveness against common skin pathogens.

Ulmo honey research: Acevedo et al. (2017) found that Chilean Ulmo honey inhibited Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Salmonella enteritidis. In vivo studies by Patricia V et al. (2020) showed that Ulmo honey promotes burn wound re-epithelialization by modulating anti-inflammatory factors and stimulating monocyte responses.

Special properties of Manuka honey: L A K et al. (2011) discovered that, in addition to hydrogen peroxide and other antibacterial substances, Manuka honey contains a unique compound called methylglyoxal (often referred to as Unique Manuka Factor, UMF). Soares S et al. (2017) confirmed that Manuka honey effectively inhibits Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli species, with its mechanism involving interference with bacterial division, thereby inhibiting proliferation.

Gastrointestinal Application: An Alternative Therapy for Helicobacter pylori

The antibacterial action of honey has garnered international attention as an alternative therapy for inhibiting Helicobacter pylori. Ndip R N et al. (2007) tested the effects of Manuka™, Capillano®, Eco, and Mountain honey on H. pylori strains isolated from patients with gastrointestinal diseases. They found that Mountain honey at 75% concentration had the strongest effect, though no statistically significant differences were observed among the four types of honey.

Mechanism of the Anti-Ulcer Activity of Flavonoids

Current explanations for the anti-ulcer mechanism of flavonoids in honey vary. Some studies suggest that flavonoids increase prostaglandin content in the gastric mucosa, thereby enhancing mucosal protection, inhibiting acid secretion, and preventing peptic ulcer formation (Vilegas W et al., 1999; Speroni E et al., 1993). Other studies propose that flavonoids inhibit reactive oxygen species-induced ulcers through anti-lipid peroxidation effects (Martin M et al., 1998; Young J F et al., 1999; Duarte J et al., 2001).

Conclusion

The antibacterial action of honey results from the synergy of multiple mechanisms: high osmotic pressure provides a physical barrier, an acidic environment promotes tissue repair, the hydrogen peroxide system offers an activatable chemical defense, plant-derived compounds confer floral origin-specific properties, and lysozyme contributes additional antibacterial power. Together, these mechanisms enable honey to inhibit a broad range of microorganisms, including drug-resistant bacteria.

Attention: The information above is synthesized from the literature for academic communication and general science outreach. For specific health-related uses of honey, professional advice is recommended.

Reference:

1. Acevedo F, Torres P, Oomah B D, et al. Volatile and non-volatile/semi-volatile compounds and in vitro bioactive properties of Chilean Ulmo (Eucryphia cordifolia Cav.) honey[J]. Food Research International,2017,94:20-28.
2. ARAYA G W,BERHE G K. Evaluation of antibacterial activity of honey against multi drug resistant bacteria in Ayder Referral and Teaching Hospital,Northern Ethiopia[J]. Springer Plus, 2016, 5: 1-8.
3. BOGDANOV S. Nature and origin of the antibacterial substances in honey[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology,1997,30(7) :748-753.
4. CREMERS N, BELAS A, SANTOS COSTA S, et al. In vitro antimicrobial efficacy of two medical grade honey formulations against common high-risk meticillin-resistant Staphylococci and Pseudomonas spp. pathogens [J]. Vet Dermatol, 2020, 31(2):90-96.
5. DOUGLAS Y T,ERNEST E M,DAVID A P,et al.Acute hypoxemia in humans enhances the neutrophil inflammatory response [J]. Shock, 2002, 17 (4):269-273.
6. JONATHAN C,MATTHEW D,THOMAS P, et al.The antimicrobial activity of prototype modified honeys that generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) hydrogen peroxide[J]. BMC Research Notes, 2015, 8:20.
7. Juraj M, Marcela B, Ioannis K, et al. Honey antibacterial activity: A neglected aspect of honey quality assurance as functional food[J]. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2021, 118(PB): 870-886.
8. KWAKMAN P H S,VELDE A A T,BOER L D,et al. How honey kills bacteria[J]. Faseb Journal,2010,24(7):2576-2582.
9. L A K, C M P, M R G. A survey of the antibacterial activity of some New Zealand honeys[J]. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 2011,43(12):817-822.
10. Lokman H M, Yong L L, Katherine H, et al. A review of commonly used methodologies for assessing the antibacterial activity of honey and honey products[J]. Antibiotics, 2022, 11(7):975.
11. MANISHA D M, SHYAMAPADA M. Honey: its medicinal property and antibacterial activity[J]. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine,2011,2:154-160.
12. MANUEL V-M, YOLANDA R-N,JUANA F-L,et al.Functional properties of honey, propolis, and royal jelly[J]. Journal of Food Science, 2008,73 (9): 117-124. 
13. MARIA I I, ANA C, ROXANA O,et al. Physico chemical and bioactive properties of honeys from Northwestern Argentina[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology,2011,44(9):1922-1930.
14. MOLAN P C. The evidence supporting the use of honey as a wound dressing [J]. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, 2006, 5:40-54.
15. MOLAN P, COOPER R, MOLAN P, et al. Why honey works[M]. Honey in Modern Wound,2009,9:36-37.
16. MORRONI G, ALVAREZ-SUAREZ JM, BRENCIANI A, et al. Comparison of the antimicrobial activities of four honeys from three countries (New Zealand, Cuba, and Kenya) [J]. Front Microbiol, 2018, 9:1378.
17. Ndip R N, Malange Takang A E, Echakachi C M, et al. In-vitro an-ti microbial activity of selected honeys on clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori[J]. African Health Sciences, 2007, 7(4): 228-232.
18. NIKHAT S, FAZIL M. History, phyto chemistry, experimental pharmacology and clinical uses of honey: A comprehensive review with special reference to Unani medicine [J]. J Ethnopharmacol, 2022,282:114614.
19. NOLAN VC, HARRISON J, COX JAG. Dissecting the antimicrobial composition of honey [J].Antibiotics (Basel), 2019, 8(4): 251. 
20. Patricia V, Gloria M, Felipe L, et al. Bioactive compounds and antibacterial properties of mono floral Ulmo honey[J]. CyTA - Journal of Food, 2020, 18(1): 11-19.
21. PRAETINEE P,SERGIO A,PRODPRAN T. et al.Biomedical activity and related volatile compounds of thai honeys from 3 different honeybee species [J].Journal of Food Science, 2015, 80 (10): M2228-M2240.
22. Soares S, Amaral J S, Oliveira M B P P, et al. A comprehensive review on the main honey authentication issues: production and origin[J].Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 2017, 16(5):1072-1100.
23. Wang Yin, Liu Cailing, Wang Xian, et al. Early detection of osmotolerant yeast characteristics and their contamination in honey based on head space gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry [J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(12): 267-274.
24. ZHU G Y,WANG Q,LU S L,et al. Hydrogen peroxide: a potential wound therapeutic target[J]. Medical Principles &. Practice International Journal of the Kuwait University Health Science Centre,2017, 26:301-308.